News

Adblock Plus Fuels the Debate over Native Ads

Written on
Dec 17, 2013 
Author
Richard L. Tso  |


ADOTAS – In a move to fuel healthy industry discussion, the German online ad-blocking technology company Adblock Plus is allowing its community to publicly debate the fate of Native Ads. The emerging format that integrates branded and editorial content has been hotly debated in recent months, not only because it blurs the lines between advertising and editorial, but because there is not yet an industry standard definition for what “native” really means.

“At the basic level, native ads are paid experiences that are complementary to the platform and content in which they are presented,” wrote Ken Willner, CEO of Zumobi in All Things D earlier this year. “While examples include Sponsored Stories on Facebook or Sponsored Tweets on Twitter, this doesn’t quite do the term justice. Truly native advertising takes things one step further, referring to seamlessly integrating brands into the medium, so much so that the consumer gets more value from the advertising as part of a greater content consumption experience.”

Ad industry journalist Peter Kafka offers the opinion that native advertising is about “selling stuff that people want to look at.” And native allows people to start thinking about brands, without making the ads blatant or disruptive.

The Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) recently formed a group of advertisers and publishers to define parameters for the native ad format and recently published the IAB Native Advertising Playbook, but it left out an important group from the equation: users.

So Adblock Plus has called upon its large open source community of users to publicly debate whether to update the Acceptable Ads evaluative framework to acknowledge native ads, and to define if any forms of native advertising might meet the Acceptable Ads criteria.

“When I met with different companies and media folks at ad:tech New York last month, it was clear that native ads was one of the most popular topics there, not to mention an attempt by the ad industry to go in a new direction,” said Ben Williams, PR director, Adblock Plus. “As the bridge between users and online advertising, we felt like we should take an active role in the discussion around native ads. The IAB’s playbook is an important start to the conversation, but we wanted to engage the other side and get users involved, too.”

“As online advertising formats evolve, it is our responsibility at Adblock Plus to understand them and define when these new formats should be blocked, and if and when they can be classified as Acceptable Ads,” said Till Faida, co-founder of Adblock Plus and the open-source project that supports it. “On the one hand, native ads are a positive reaction against ad intrusiveness; on the other hand, the seamless integration of advertising within editorial content blurs what we think should be a clearly distinguishable line between the two. So we are calling upon our public forum of Internet users to form an opinion and suggest some guidelines.”

While our industry is reliant on keeping the online advertising business alive, there is a need to offer consumers the option to removing ads they don’t wish to see. In the age of banner-blindness and ad fatigue, both publishers and advertisers can benefit from delivering ads only to those targeted consumers who wish to receive them. This leads to higher conversion rates and less ad waste – a win for consumers, advertisers and publishers.





Richard L. Tso is a reporter for Adotas and an avid writer covering the intersection of technology and advertising, fashion and music. With over 12 years of experience in the Advertising, Marketing and Public Relations industries, Richard has held executive positions at global agencies and technology companies and is founder of the interactive communications firm Pseudosound Consulting LLC. A classical cellist and painter, he believes that sometimes sound carries more weight than words. He is a graduate of Stanford University.

Reader Comments.

I can understand the utility of ad blockers for a number of reasons – especially to rid pop ups and a lot of useless or irrelevant banner/display ads from our lives – but native ads are a different breed. Based on what we’re seeing from the ad networks, social networks, and publishers that understand good native advertising (Airpush, Facebook, The Atlantic, etc.) I don’t see why native ads wouldn’t be more warmly embraced by consumers? I mean, this is as close as we’re going to get to relevant, practical ad content that actually gives us some informational value regardless of whether we buy what is being sold.

Posted by Bobby Wells | 2:59 am on December 18, 2013.

We dont need local ads. Companies like fb,twitter, google try to survive because of ads. Glad that adblock guys.Recently twotter and fb are trying every way possible to push their annoying ads.

Thanks adblock and we always will support you.

Posted by Aaron | 10:43 am on December 20, 2013.

This Adblock Plus “large open source community of users” consists of a heavily moderated forum where any form of dissent is instantly deleted, fake communities and an agressive, for-profit company by the name of Eyeo. Documented here:

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=349411

Posted by Holger Schmidt | 5:29 am on December 22, 2013.

Leave a Comment

Add a comment

No Tags
Article Sponsor

More News