Too Big to Fail or Too Big to Succeed, Part 2
DM CONFIDENTIAL – Last week we found ourselves comparing two unlikely companies, Yahoo! and Groupon, not so much for any inherent similarities but because timing brought them together in the news. Yahoo! fired its chief executive and finds itself potentially up for sale, while Groupon’s CEO is under pressure and its IPO is now in doubt. Yahoo! at least still makes money almost despite itself while Groupon generates significant revenue but has little cash left to show for it.
Of the two, it looked almost certain that Groupon would have taken over the mantle of Internet-high-flier to become for this generation of internet companies what Yahoo! represented more than a decade ago. It even seemed possible that Groupon might go public and then buy out Yahoo! What a great investment that could make — guaranteed deliverability to some of the best consumers online.
Yahoo! still earns more money than Groupon even if it has had no growth. It has weathered booms and busts. Converting Internet years into typical years, Yahoo is The New York Times of digital media.
And what of Groupon? Today it feels as though we cannot put any scenario aside.
As we wrote last week, while it would seem unlikely, would it be impossible to imagine Groupon going completely out of business? What would it take for that to happen? They have a business model but not enough cash. Are they like Webvan in that regard — i.e., too early for their time only to see their business recreated slightly differently by either those with industry experience, like Whole Foods, or local upstarts with a better grasp on costs, like Max Delivery? With its thousands of employees, Webvan like Groupon today probably looked too big to fail.
“Too big to fail” is always an interesting concept. Live long enough, and you will likely see every company hit a rough patch. Some seem to pull through. IBM went from virtually invincible to one giant mediocrity back to an upper echelon institution. General Motors went from no. 1 in the world to bankruptcy to a leaner, maybe meaner but at least still fighting machine. Apple is the most valuable company in the world after nearly going out of business in the 90s.
All of these companies achieved the absolute pinnacle only to fall almost into a black hole and in real jeopardy of not just visiting but staying at the real Hotel California — oblivion. While those who return from the brink or even having visited the other side rarely climb their way back to the top or surpass their previous level of prominence, (á la Apple), they each have something in common: they made it first. This is the potential issue with Groupon.
Groupon has had success and light speed growth, but they haven’t made it. They haven’t truly stood on their own two feet. They have been the college student or fresh graduate showing immense promise but still living off the doll. In this case the doll just happened to include almost a billion dollars in funding, not nearly all of which went into operations.
What they did with their “parents” money is exactly what they have done with our money. They have transferred bad habits to businesses and consumers. Discounting isn’t new, but it’s a privilege not a right. We don’t deserve to get everything for so cheap. We should have to earn it. That type of business, though, one that rewards good behavior and turns customers into repeat customers just doesn’t make as much money as one that picks up the seniors and drops them off at the doorsteps of the casino for the weekend.
The other problem with being on the doll is that it didn’t teach proper discipline. They learned to continue spending without really having to worry about the impact of that spending. That they needed to hire up in order to reach sales goals and penetrate new markets faster than anyone else makes sense.
At what point, though, do you do so sustainably as opposed to simply razing the land? The company has a customer acquisition machine, but they got a little complacent with the ingredients of their recipe. They would go out and buy names almost indeterminate of the true quality just to have enough names in a given market.
Had they done so efficiently, it might have required a third of the names. Had they done so in a more “green” manner, they might see more brand awareness, loyalty and long-term quality for their end customers. The problem is that they didn’t need to do so, and now they find themselves in a fight unlike any other.
Groupon isn’t the entitled kid with unlimited funds any more. The trust fund is about to go dry. They should have the skills they need, but it will take some real cleansing for them to stand on their own two feet, and a large dose of humility to work their way back up on their own merits.
Cross-published at DM Confidential’s blog.
Reader Comments.
“The trust fund is about to go dry.” Well put.
- Pingback from Is Facebook The Second Internet?
Leave a Comment
Article Sponsor
More Features
-
Loading ...
Latest News
- Sense Networks Releases New Predictive Mobile Ad Targeting Services May 23rd 2012 ADOTAS – Mobile location data/services provider Sense Networks announced today a [...] more »
- Marketo Takes Marketing Automation to Social Media May 23rd 2012 ADOTAS – At a point when Facebook’s flop of an [...] more »
- Adap.tv Announces Video App Center, Multiple Tech Solutions Under One Roof May 23rd 2012 ADOTAS – Today, video advertising platform and marketplace provider Adap.tv unveiled its [...] more »
- AdTruth Assembles Industry Leaders in Gambit for a “Mobile Universal Identifier” May 22nd 2012 ADOTAS - Device recognition service AdTruth (a division of fraud [...] more »
- Adobe Announces “Simulcast” Solution to Make Cross-Device Viewing More Like TV May 22nd 2012 ADOTAS - Today, Adobe released an updated version of its [...] more »
- Two Reports: Photo/Video Is the Fastest-Growing App Category May 22nd 2012 DM CONFIDENTIAL – According to recent numbers released by Flurry, [...] more »
- Facebook’s IPO: You Knew It Was Coming May 18th 2012 ADOTAS - It’s been a day of superlatives, as the [...] more »
Features
- Infographic:”The Social Sharing Button Playground” May 23rd 2012
- How The New “Call Spammer” Spends Your Mobile Click-to-Call Budgets May 23rd 2012
- Infographic: Where to Sell Online (A Flow Chart) May 22nd 2012
- How Online Measurement Is Transforming the Traditional Ad World May 22nd 2012
- Infographic: The ROI of Tag Management May 21st 2012
Spotlight
Sponsormob Leads the Way Into RTB for MobileADOTAS – For more than half a decade, Berlin-based tech firm Sponsormob has remained relevant in an industry characterized by [...] more...
Reader Favorites
Classifieds
- Business Director-IEB-Microsoft Studios (792444)
- Marketing Communications Manager, Senior-IEB-TV &
- Senior Industry Marketing Manager - Media and Ente
- MARKETING DIRECTOR (medical software company)
- Senior Product Marketing Manager
Recent Comments
- How The New “Call Spammer” Spends Your Mobile Click-to-Call Budgets: [...] benign “pocket dial” or “accidental call,” call spammers explain why click-to-call ads can receive as
- The motivations behind gamification: Tapping into psychology | e6be marketing: [...] (http://www.adotas.com/2012/05/starting-simple-with-gamification/) (http://www.informationweek.com/thebrainyard/news/social_networking_private_platforms/231900162) [...]
- David: Photo sharing and video sharing apps are growing at an exponential pace. This is but
- Afternoon Announcements: Seven Essential Email Marketing Tips, How Engagement Can Measure Customer Sentiment & Lessons in Content Strategy From Children's Books | Duncan/Day Advertising: [...] How Much is a Facebook Follower Worth? [Ragan's] How Engagement Can Measure Sentiment &