Publisher Blueprints, Part 1: Pre-Defining Success
ADOTAS – Inspiration to create a website can come from any number of places. An idea could pop up from having a conversation with a colleague, viewing a competitor’s website, noticing a gap in the marketplace, studying response data from current customers, brainstorming sessions, etc.
Some ideas seem to have the perfect fit; they seem so groundbreaking and significant that you are positive they will work. All you need to do is build it and customers will come. You immediately dive head first into development of your idea sparing no expense on features and functionality along the way. This site is going to be perfect.
Several months pass and your product is finally ready to be released. You swell up with pride a bit as you announce to your friends and colleagues what you have created. You may have invested far more than you thought you would initially, but you know you have made all of the right decisions for your customers. The consumer’s experience on your website is exactly as it should be and you are virtually guaranteed success.
So it’s time to release the website. You buy some initial traffic to the site to see how it works, but it’s not generating enough revenue to offset the traffic cost. You double-check the technical functionality of the site and it all checks out. It must be the traffic. You segment the traffic differently and buy more. It’s still not backing out.
You have invested so much into this site you are determined to make it work. You keep spending and tweaking the site, but its just not working like you thought it would and you are still losing money or barely breaking even. You cut your losses and either let the website run with no additional investment or shut it down and move on to the next idea already in the hole from your last project and confidence depleted.
Don’t feel too bad because you are not alone. In fact, most online businesses never obtain the desired traction and never turn into hugely profitable businesses for their owners. I know this from personal experience. I have spent years developing a variety of websites and I am not ashamed to say that the vast majority of those websites have been complete failures.
What I have taken away from those experiences is that most ideas for websites will fail, those failures are a normal part of the process, and that through acceptance of those failures as a normal part of the process and being prepared for them, you can increase your chances for future success. In other words, through the creation of a lean process that gets the right products to market quickly and cheaply, you can let consumers test the idea of your website.
If they like it, their feedback and response will drive the feature set development for the end product. The process involves three major steps: pre-defining your success metrics, iterating through ideas and accelerating failures.
Pre-defining your success metrics is a two-part process. First, you need to justify why you are building the site. There are many justifications for building websites and those justifications vary greatly from one website owner to the next. Identifying your justification prior to creating a site will allow you to make sure that you build the right type of site to meet your needs and that you recognize when your site is fulfilling its purpose.
Some typical justifications include: building a marketing list, generating a new revenue stream, stabilizing media buys when ad spends change frequently across advertisers, providing value to and/or cross-selling to an existing consumer base, building a unique offering for a publisher base, and more.
Second, you need to define the competitive landscape for your proposed website. You need to understand exactly what you will have to pay for traffic and how much you will have to earn on the backend of your website in order to afford that traffic plus your margin. There are many metrics that traffic publishers are going to care about. There are open rates, click rates, conversion rates, etc., but the most important metric used by savvy publishers is effective revenue/cost per thousand (ECPM) because it factors all of those metrics together.
Publishers will use the ECPM of your website to valuate their traffic against alternate websites so they can make relative comparisons between multiple types of offerings with different conversion metrics and payouts. Each type of traffic has significantly different ECPM values as well as different associated costs to a media buyer. You need to figure out which type of traffic you are going to test with and what the typical ECPM’s are for that traffic.
Once you know competitive ECPMs, you can take the amount of traffic that you want to buy, divide it by one thousand, and multiply it by the target ECPM to figure out what your target revenue per user sent to your site needs to be. That revenue per user needs to be enough to achieve the publishers target ECPM plus your margin if you want to continue to receive traffic from that publisher and make money for yourself.
In real terms, if you are going to buy one hundred thousand units of traffic to your site, your target ECPM is $5, and your target margin is 20 percent then you need to make six hundred dollars off that traffic to both keep your publisher happy and make margin.
Reader Comments.
No comments yet
Leave a Comment
Article Sponsor
More Features
-
Loading ...
Latest News
- Covario Issues Annual Client Awards for SEO/SEM Success February 10th 2012 ADOTAS - Search engine marketing/SEO services provider Covario issued the [...] more »
- BlueKai Report Explains DMPs to Publishers February 10th 2012 ADOTAS - BlueKai released a report this week on the [...] more »
- Funding in Brief: $10M for Spongecell, $8M for Prolexic February 9th 2012 ADOTAS – Rich media ad company Spongecell has raised $10 million [...] more »
- Google AdMob Axes Minimum Bids, Targeting Fees February 9th 2012 ADOTAS - As of Feb. 15, Google will change its [...] more »
- Infographic: HootSuite Analyses Social Media Impact of Super Bowl Ads February 7th 2012 ADOTAS - So, it’s the Tuesday after the Super Bowl, [...] more »
- Facebook to Serve Mobile Ads in Coming Weeks February 6th 2012 ADOTAS – According to a Financial Times report, Facebook will [...] more »
- Survey: 39 Percent of Mobile Users Responded to Super Bowl Ads Via Mobile February 6th 2012 ADOTAS - During the Super Bowl yesterday, mobile ad network [...] more »
Features
- Infographic: The Online Ad Industry Is Like the Stock Market February 10th 2012
- Mobile Search: More Intent, More SMB Opportunity February 10th 2012
- BlueKai Report Explains DMPs to Publishers February 10th 2012
- Attribution Online: Introducers and Influencers and Closers… Oh My! February 9th 2012
- With gTLDs, Global Branding Starts with a Name February 9th 2012
Spotlight
Sponsormob Leads the Way Into RTB for MobileADOTAS – For more than half a decade, Berlin-based tech firm Sponsormob has remained relevant in an industry characterized by [...] more...
Reader Favorites
Classifieds
- PS Technical Writer - SEO Data Analyst
- Interactive Project Manager
- Media Buyer
- PHP Software Engineer (Facebook Platform/Social AP
- SEO/Marketing Internship at Green Education Startu
Recent Comments
- HootSuite Social Media Management » More Apps, Open API, and the Solution Partner Program ~ News Roundup: [...] mentioned in our HootSuite’s Super Bowl XLVI Social Media Recap, adotas and MediaPost analyzed our
- News about Google Adwords issue #412: [...] ads for AdWords to adCenter and align with industry standards, adCenter has chang
- VB: What exactly makes an ad "high quality"?
- Survey: 39 Percent of Mobile Users Responded to Super Bowl Ads Via Mobile - ADOTAS | Mobile2 | Scoop.it: [...] background-position: 50% 0px; background-color:#222222; background-repeat : no-repeat; }