Meaning Within Measurement: Sentiment Analysis and Social Media
ADOTAS – We’ve seen the blunders big companies have made by not monitoring and, more important, not reacting intelligently and expeditiously to social upheaval in the digital space -– how can we forget United Airlines’ fate following musician Dave Carroll’s infamous YouTube video of “United Breaks Guitars” and its sequels?
In today’s current market, businesses and their reputations cannot
afford to take that kind of hit.
Through blogs, message boards, fan pages and the like, the Internet is fast rebalancing the relationship between customers and companies, while social media networks, such as YouTube and Twitter, are giving consumers instant and, occasionally, very powerful ways to “strike back” and make their voices heard.
Companies from all industries have quickly realized the necessity to go where the conversation is going to remain relevant and pertinent to customers. Big companies, such as Ford, Procter & Gamble and Coca-Cola to name but a few, have recognized the need to use the Internet and, more important, the rich vein of market intelligence that social media sites provide, to “listen,” monitor and, if need be, counteract any bad publicity these virtual -– and viral -– conversations might
be generating in order to avoid a fate similar to that of United Airlines.
Social Media Analysis — Tools Abound
From The Financial Times’ “Newsswift” program to the funkier-named “Tweetfeel,” “Twendz” and “Twitrratr,” a plethora of social media analysis tools have hit the market. These include solutions, such as text mining, natural language processing and other sentiment analysis technologies that have been developed to help organisations gain intelligence from social media sites and build a more complete view of their brands’ reputation from a consumer’s perspective.
Businesses are clearly spoiled for choice. Social media technology and techniques include web crawling APIs that collect keywords and free format text relating to specific criteria, text mining applications that analyse key concepts, features and even segments of common terms, as well as pattern matching, probabilistic modeling and sentiment analysis technologies that evaluate the information as positive, neutral or negative.
Such tools and techniques have been added to the product portfolios of an array of companies including Internet/publishing/data mining/research/marketing organisations including the likes of Factiva, Motive Quest and Omniture, to keep on top of the social media game.
Is this seemingly “Jack of all trades, master of none” approach to social media analysis a reliable one or should businesses wanting to monitor, measure and understand social media conversations opt for organisations with an expert analytic heritage at its core?
Which One’s for Me?
A combination of the above techniques can undoubtedly provide a richer and more contextual set of data than traditional keyword spotting tools -– yet which is the best one to adopt? It is clear that there are companies out there that generally take a couple of different stances to analyzing social media information –- so it is important to note the distinctions, which will ultimately impact the relevance,
reliability and validity a business might be looking for.
The simplest algorithms work by scanning keywords to categorize a statement as positive or negative based on simple binary analysis (“love” is good; “hate” is bad). However, such an approach fails to capture the subtleties that bring human language to life: irony, sarcasm, slang and other idiomatic expressions.
Social media, which are by nature dynamic and based on unstructured forms of information, do not fit neatly into traditional database-driven analytics systems. You need reliable sentiment analysis capabilities that require the ability to understand many linguistic shades of gray.
Sentiment Analysis: The True Differentiator
Sentiment analysis is an important but very hard to master science still in its infancy. While it can be quite accurate –- reliability 80% or higher -– it does not
necessarily make the data valid or useful for making strategic decisions grounded in effective brand monitoring.
Also when it comes to languages, things get more complex than simple tweet or text
analysis, making success an even more elusive concept for sentiment analysis, where cultural differences –- an American “quite” would mean “very” whereas an English “quite” would refer to “not at all” -– and linguistics come into play. Sinful isn’t always sinfully good chocolate.
Understanding social media is much more sophisticated and demands building in an analysis of sentiment. It is fair to assume that the added value promised from a company whose heritage isn’t a sophisticated analytical one, would not be equipped to analyse and provide as relevant results when translating finer linguistic nuances, cultural factors and the vagaries of human emotion, and might not help avoid what could be very damning social media comments.
The choice of a social media analysis platform to protect brand reputation requires companies to include the important, but very hard to master, science of sentiment analysis into its analytical reporting. In this fast-paced market, it is important to be able to review information in near real time.
Bringing all this data together –- research, monitoring, sentiment analysis and other analytical capabilities –- can start to provide the grand unified vision that overlays all relevant data sets for correlative analysis. Only this way will we start to determine an ROI for social media campaigns –- finding the meaning within the measurement is critical.
Reader Comments.
Interesting perspective, but as my father said back in the 60s when he was publisher of Fortune: “If we can put a man into orbit, why can’t we, with any degree of certainty, measure the effectiveness of communications. The reason is simple, and perhaps a bit old fashioned. People. Human beings with a wide range of choice, cantankerous, capricous and consumed by innumerable conflicting interests and conflicting desires. ”
The problem with your post is that it ignores the importance of the human element. At best, automated sentiment analysis is correct about 65% of the time. If the finance department was only accurate 65% of the time, the CEO would be in jail, and the company would be bankrupt. You cannot rely entirely on computers. You need humans, trained in the science of research and analtyics to check the accuracy, as well as to interpret the results.
Good article which states concisely opportunities vs problems in social media analytics. Being a text miner myself i could add my 2 cents by saying that accuracy in sentiment analysis is very application – specific, typical being around 72 – 75% in my experience. This technology provides very good insights in what people want and how they think, why they don’t like specific products / services or politicians. Great caution is needed not to make wrong conclusions though.
Here’s a perfect formula for sentiment analysis: http://www.conversition.com/a-formula-for-perfect-sentiment-analysis/
This is an excellent post. Perhaps the best free semantic analysis tool out there is TipTop http://FeelTipTop.com
Leave a Comment
Article Sponsor
More Features
-
Loading ...
Latest News
- Infographic: HootSuite Analyses Social Media Impact of Super Bowl Ads February 7th 2012 ADOTAS - So, it’s the Tuesday after the Super Bowl, [...] more »
- Facebook to Serve Mobile Ads in Coming Weeks February 6th 2012 ADOTAS – According to a Financial Times report, Facebook will [...] more »
- Survey: 39 Percent of Mobile Users Responded to Super Bowl Ads Via Mobile February 6th 2012 ADOTAS - During the Super Bowl yesterday, mobile ad network [...] more »
- Sponsormob Leads the Way Into RTB for Mobile February 3rd 2012 ADOTAS – For more than half a decade, Berlin-based tech [...] more »
- Weird Study: Mobile Purchasing While in the Bathroom on the Rise February 3rd 2012 DM CONFIDENTIAL - According to 11mark, three-quarters of Americans with mobile [...] more »
- This Week’s New Hires February 3rd 2012 ADOTAS – Another week, another round of new gigs. Here [...] more »
- Two Surveys: What Are We Doing with Mobile Devices During the Super Bowl? February 2nd 2012 ADOTAS - With the Super Bowl fast approaching and the [...] more »
Features
- Covering the Digital Buy: Super Bowl Winners and Losers February 8th 2012
- How Social Targeting Can Lead to Discovery February 7th 2012
- Video: “The Future of Engagement” Looks at Audi’s #solongvampires Campaign February 7th 2012
- Three Best Practices for Increasing Subscriber Engagement February 7th 2012
- Reaching the Multi-Tasker in 2012 February 6th 2012
Spotlight
Sponsormob Leads the Way Into RTB for MobileADOTAS – For more than half a decade, Berlin-based tech firm Sponsormob has remained relevant in an industry characterized by [...] more...
Reader Favorites
Classifieds
- PS Technical Writer - SEO Data Analyst
- Interactive Project Manager
- Media Buyer
- PHP Software Engineer (Facebook Platform/Social AP
- SEO/Marketing Internship at Green Education Startu
Recent Comments
- Bob: and just like that he got fired.
- 101 Best Twitter Apps Blog » Blog Archive » Social Networking: Without a Champion, Enterprise Social Tools Sputter – Formtek Blog (blog): [...] And Cons Of Social Media In Education …mediabistro.comMashable -Minnesota Daily -ADOTASall 97 news [...]
- The Rise of the Data-Driven CMO | ADMA Blog: [...] of information transparent to customers also stand to gain financially. According to a separate
- Tuesday, February 7 | Duncan/Day Advertising: [...] Messages Ever Work Online? [Econsultancy] 39% of Mobile Users Responded to Super Bowl Ads