Adotas

Where media buyers start online







News

Bing Is for Clickers

Written on
Dec 7, 2009 
Author
Gavin Dunaway  |
Share
Bing Is for Clickers

bing_small.jpgADOTAS – Although Google certainly has the lion’s share of searches, rival Bing has a growing advantage in a category close to advertiser’s hearts: click-through rate.

As recorded by search advertising network Chitka, Bing’s CTR sits at 1.74% versus Google’s 0.98%, about 75% higher. In July Chitka reported that Bing’s CTR was 50% higher than Google’s.

However, according to Chitka, Bing’s share of search traffic dipped from 8% to 5.75% over that time period (even though comScore had it on the rise, nearing 10% in October). Also, AOL’s CTR was 2.5% and Ask.com’s marked 1.78% — both received less than 2% of search traffic.

So while all three of these have decidedly lower clicks and impressions than Google, their CTRs are far better. Does that mean their search marketers know their (generally limited) pool of users better?

Or, as TechCrunch’s Erick Schonfeld so delicately puts it, “Is a group’s propensity to click on ads inversely related to its tech savvyness?”





Reader Comments.

o happy daaaaaay

Posted by abran | 1:22 pm on December 7, 2009.

The difference in click-thru rate might be based on two factors:

1- Google makes it easy for do-it-yourselfers to set up their own search campaigns. This means less sophisticated advertisers and less compelling copy.

2- Google has more advertisers, which may dilute response on a per advertiser basis.

Posted by Michael Teitelbaum | 4:02 pm on December 7, 2009.

Naturally these are very questionable results; perhaps the CTR is lower on Google because more beginners are using it.

Posted by Marc-Antoine Lacroix | 5:17 pm on December 7, 2009.

An alternative explanation, close to heresy I admit, is that Bing could be a better search engine. But no! Surely nothing will ever change! Surely Google will dominate search forever? How could such a dominating position ever fade? Hmm… Yahoo, Lycos, Alta Vista, Netscape – no lessons in any of those I suppose…

Posted by Brandt Dainow | 5:55 am on December 8, 2009.

That’s a notable difference between Chitika’s and comScore’s measurements. With the former having Bing at 5.75% and the latter having Bing at 9.9%, that’s a ratio flirting with 2:1 proportions. Yeah, I think it’s safe to label that as statistically significant. It’s also a major clue that one of the two surveys is flawed enough to make all of the results unreliable.

Posted by thecynicalmarketer | 1:47 am on December 12, 2009.

Cynical Marketer, you’ve got a point, but we (Chitika) and ComScore measure different things. Whereas ComScore is measuring the number of searches executed by the various engines, we measure the traffic that those searches generate. If someone performs a search and doesn’t end up clicking through on an organic result, we don’t record it as a search, but ComScore does.

Posted by Daniel Ruby | 5:33 pm on December 24, 2009.

Leave a Comment

Add a comment

No Tags
Article Sponsor

More News



  • Right now, at the beginning of 2012, what are you watching the most closely for its ad and marketing opportunities?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

Latest News

News Archive

Spotlight

Sponsormob Leads the Way Into RTB for MobileADOTAS – For more than half a decade, Berlin-based tech firm Sponsormob has remained relevant in an industry characterized by [...] more...



Adotas Partnership