<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Search Engine Ranking Is A Measure of Market Leadership</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adotas.com/2009/09/search-engine-ranking-is-a-measure-of-market-leadership/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adotas.com/2009/09/search-engine-ranking-is-a-measure-of-market-leadership/</link>
	<description>Where Interactive Advertising Begins</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:07:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: click me</title>
		<link>http://www.adotas.com/2009/09/search-engine-ranking-is-a-measure-of-market-leadership/#comment-847673</link>
		<dc:creator>click me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adotas.com/2009/09/search-engine-ranking-is-a-measure-of-market-leadership/#comment-847673</guid>
		<description>What is the best company to use for search engine optimization? I found seop.com &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.quickranks.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Quickranks&lt;/a&gt; and seo.com What&#039;s the best service to use?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the best company to use for search engine optimization? I found seop.com <a href="http://www.quickranks.com" rel="nofollow">Quickranks</a> and seo.com What&#8217;s the best service to use?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Making Money On Line</title>
		<link>http://www.adotas.com/2009/09/search-engine-ranking-is-a-measure-of-market-leadership/#comment-784596</link>
		<dc:creator>Making Money On Line</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adotas.com/2009/09/search-engine-ranking-is-a-measure-of-market-leadership/#comment-784596</guid>
		<description>Actually it is also important for whick keywords the site is on the first place. If it is for the general one-term keyword, so the traffic is not so targetted and the converstions are low.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually it is also important for whick keywords the site is on the first place. If it is for the general one-term keyword, so the traffic is not so targetted and the converstions are low.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debashish Shaw</title>
		<link>http://www.adotas.com/2009/09/search-engine-ranking-is-a-measure-of-market-leadership/#comment-783590</link>
		<dc:creator>Debashish Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 22:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adotas.com/2009/09/search-engine-ranking-is-a-measure-of-market-leadership/#comment-783590</guid>
		<description>@ Brandt I think you may have misread the article - Daniel agrees that conversion rates remain relatively static across ad positions. If anything, he also agrees that position #2 having a higher conversion rate is most likely an anomaly. 

@ Steve Agreed completely. The key question is are you optimized enough to be #1?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Brandt I think you may have misread the article &#8211; Daniel agrees that conversion rates remain relatively static across ad positions. If anything, he also agrees that position #2 having a higher conversion rate is most likely an anomaly. </p>
<p>@ Steve Agreed completely. The key question is are you optimized enough to be #1?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Baldwin</title>
		<link>http://www.adotas.com/2009/09/search-engine-ranking-is-a-measure-of-market-leadership/#comment-783554</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Baldwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adotas.com/2009/09/search-engine-ranking-is-a-measure-of-market-leadership/#comment-783554</guid>
		<description>Your study accords with what we know from heat maps. Positions matter -- a lot -- because being #1 delivers far more volume than lower positions. Whether one can afford to be #1 is another matter, of course, and this is where all the hard work of optimizing the conversion chain comes into play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your study accords with what we know from heat maps. Positions matter &#8212; a lot &#8212; because being #1 delivers far more volume than lower positions. Whether one can afford to be #1 is another matter, of course, and this is where all the hard work of optimizing the conversion chain comes into play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandt Dainow</title>
		<link>http://www.adotas.com/2009/09/search-engine-ranking-is-a-measure-of-market-leadership/#comment-783468</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandt Dainow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 11:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adotas.com/2009/09/search-engine-ranking-is-a-measure-of-market-leadership/#comment-783468</guid>
		<description>I am afraid Daniel is just plain wrong here.  Ad position is not important to click-through rate or conversions, the text on the ad is what counts.  He has researched only 1 site over a short period of time, whereas I researched this over a 5-year period across a range of sites, covering multiple sectors.  This eliminates biases specific to individual sites or sectors, a problem Daniel had in his research above.  My conclusions are detailed in my article on this in iMedia at http://www.imediaconnection.com//content//12991.asp. 
Position mattered in the early days when web users were naive.  They wised up years ago.  Ad design is what matters, not position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am afraid Daniel is just plain wrong here.  Ad position is not important to click-through rate or conversions, the text on the ad is what counts.  He has researched only 1 site over a short period of time, whereas I researched this over a 5-year period across a range of sites, covering multiple sectors.  This eliminates biases specific to individual sites or sectors, a problem Daniel had in his research above.  My conclusions are detailed in my article on this in iMedia at <a href="http://www.imediaconnection.com//content//12991.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.imediaconnection.com//content//12991.asp</a>.<br />
Position mattered in the early days when web users were naive.  They wised up years ago.  Ad design is what matters, not position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

