Overstock follows Amazon’s lead in dropping affiliates*
ADOTAS — Overstock has dropped affiliate advertisers in California, Hawaii, North Carolina and Rhode Island Co sent notices to all of its affiliate advertisers in California, Hawaii, North Carolina and Rhode Island.
*UPDATED:
On Monday, Amazon said it was ending its business relationships with marketing affiliates in Rhode Island so the online retailer could avoid collecting sales tax in the state. The Legislature recently passed a bill forcing companies to collect taxes *if they have online-marketing affiliates, which get a sales commission by featuring links to outside e-commerce sites on their own Web sites, in the state. This comes shortly after a similar bill in North Carolina prompted Amazon to end its relationship there.
A similar move last year in New York prompted Amazon, which is still there, and Overstock, which isn’t, to file a lawsuit against the state, which is still pending, arguing the tax law was unconstitutional.
According to the WSJ, Rebecca Madigan, founder of the affiliate trade group Performance Marketing Alliance, estimates there are some 2,000 online affiliates in Rhode Island, who pay about $3 million in state income tax.
“We’re seeing small businesses being hit,” she told the WSJ. “They are the collateral damage through all of this legislation, which inaccurately classifies affiliate marketers as sales agents” rather than advertising channels.
Amazon needs to find a different way instead of leaving people flat.
*Corrected from an earlier version.
Reader Comments.
Just to clarify your final paragraph and your earlier statement that “The Legislature recently passed a bill forcing companies to collect taxes from online-marketing affiliates” this isn’t accurate. Neither affiliates nor merchants are the source of sales tax revenue. Affiliates collect no payments from the consumer and merchants merely collect and remit sales tax when required. Payment of taxes falls entirely to the consumer, which is in fact the crux of the problem. If you as a consumer make an online purchase from ANY retailer (not just Amazon) and you are not charged sales tax, you are required by law to keep track of how much you should have paid and remit the proper amount, called use tax, to the state with your income taxes. Although most states have had use tax laws on the books for a very long time, most consumers have no idea the law even exists, so the use tax goes unpaid and uncollected. States believe that by changing the definition of ‘nexus’ to force out of state merchants to collect the tax will solve the problem.
The main issue with that is two fold. First, nexus has already been defined by the Supreme Court in the case Quill v. North Dakota as requiring a “physical presence” within a state. Affiliates are merely advertisers. They are not sale reps or employees of the companies they place banners for on their sites. States want to redefine nexus to include this sort of commission based advertising, despite the fact that it goes against the pre-established definition. Second, affiliate relationships are at-will and most programs can remove all of their affiliates in a particular state with a few clicks. Without affiliates in a state with one of these new laws passed, there is no legal need for them to collect and remit the sales tax and for many merchants, a much simpler soultion than trying to implement sales tax across multiple zones. (Nationwide, there are more than 12500 sales tax zones according to Avalara.)
The Supreme Court in its findings noted that “Congress is now free to decide whether, when, and to what extent the States mayburden interstate mail order concerns with a duty to collect use taxes” which has led to the formation of the Streamlined Sales Tax Project, or SSTP. This push for a more uniform sales and use tax system may be the answer to the problem as twenty-two states have already adopted the simplifications measures needed for enactment. Amazon has stated its support of the SSTP in a letter to California legislators.
No one is arguing that the use tax should not be collected, but it is unfair to target only the affiliate marketing community through these bills, especially when a more fair, equitable solution is at hand.
Karen,
I knew this, and still made the mistakes. It’s corrected now.
thanks
Edward
Leave a Comment
Article Sponsor
More News
-
Loading ...
Latest News
- Hulu’s Bringing Its “A” Game But… March 19th 2010 ADOTAS – Hulu’s sales team is actively subverting the ad [...] more »
- Yelp! A class-action suit? March 19th 2010 ADOTAS – One of three civil suits against Yelp filed [...] more »
- Viacom Accuses Google; Testing Digital Millennium Copyright Act March 19th 2010 Viacom has accused Google of turning a blind eye to [...] more »
- Google to Leave China April 10th? March 19th 2010 ADOTAS – According to the China Business News, Google Inc [...] more »
- [x+1] Creates The Smartest Tagging System Around March 18th 2010 ADOTAS – Today, if you happen to be at the [...] more »
- IAB’s Video Standards Tackled By ADTECH March 18th 2010 ADOTAS – ADTECH, a part of AOL Advertising and an [...] more »
- Google Search and Mobile and….TV? Oh My! March 18th 2010 ADOTAS – Google wants to dominate your screens…. Not just [...] more »
Features
- Growing Pains March 19th 2010
- For Better or For Worse? March 18th 2010
- Yahoo! Wants to Get More Personal March 17th 2010
- Creative Considerations for the iPad March 16th 2010
- Amazon Leaves Colorado Affiliates Out in the Cold March 12th 2010
Spotlight
AdBidCentral’s CEO, Vivek Veeraraghavan Talks Openly*What was the inspiration to start AdBidCentral? The conditions that inspired AdBidCentral came from a variety of factors in my personal [...] more...
Reader Favorites
Classifieds
- Communications Fellow
- Sr Director, Marketing Services
- Senior Web Analyst
- Account Director
- Director of Analytics
Recent Comments
- Jedd Gould: I think you miss the point. Publications have to charge because the content most are
- Gavin Dunaway: They're similar, but Ning is more a competitor to Facebook and MySpace while StumbleUpon considers
- Steve Feldman: Does StumbleUpon compete with and does essentially what Ning networks does?
- Bulent: I wonder how many of the clients would accept a media plan, that would -as
