<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fake blogs evolve</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adotas.com/2009/06/fake-blogs-evolve/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adotas.com/2009/06/fake-blogs-evolve/</link>
	<description>Where Interactive Advertising Begins</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:04:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoAnne  Alter</title>
		<link>http://www.adotas.com/2009/06/fake-blogs-evolve/#comment-769582</link>
		<dc:creator>JoAnne  Alter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 23:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adotas.com/2009/06/fake-blogs-evolve/#comment-769582</guid>
		<description>The fake blog and fake news junk makes it that much harder for Web publishers--those of us who actually try to give site visitors useful information--to remain credible, much less, viable.
 
I recently saw a Twitter post, complete with bit.ly link, for a gushing, get-rich-quick scheme fake article. Fake author byline and photo, all on a fake newspaper template. 

Somehow, I didn&#039;t think of it as &quot;evil genius.&quot; The only word that came to mind was, and still is, &quot;repulsive.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fake blog and fake news junk makes it that much harder for Web publishers&#8211;those of us who actually try to give site visitors useful information&#8211;to remain credible, much less, viable.</p>
<p>I recently saw a Twitter post, complete with bit.ly link, for a gushing, get-rich-quick scheme fake article. Fake author byline and photo, all on a fake newspaper template. </p>
<p>Somehow, I didn&#8217;t think of it as &#8220;evil genius.&#8221; The only word that came to mind was, and still is, &#8220;repulsive.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

