<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New York Times: Checked out The Economist lately?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adotas.com/2009/05/new-york-times-checked-out-the-economist-lately/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adotas.com/2009/05/new-york-times-checked-out-the-economist-lately/</link>
	<description>Where Interactive Advertising Begins</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:07:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Barrera</title>
		<link>http://www.adotas.com/2009/05/new-york-times-checked-out-the-economist-lately/#comment-759900</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Barrera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 17:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adotas.com/2009/05/new-york-times-checked-out-the-economist-lately/#comment-759900</guid>
		<description>Jn,
NY Times has not lost it credibility, and this is coming from a person right of center. While no doubt it has made mistakes, on the whole it&#039;s still worth the price of admission. 
While it might get oddly erratic at times (I remember a series of ridiculous articles from Jennifer 8 Lee), every time I open it there is something I needed or wanted to know. And that is becoming rarer in the rising sea of noise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jn,<br />
NY Times has not lost it credibility, and this is coming from a person right of center. While no doubt it has made mistakes, on the whole it&#8217;s still worth the price of admission.<br />
While it might get oddly erratic at times (I remember a series of ridiculous articles from Jennifer 8 Lee), every time I open it there is something I needed or wanted to know. And that is becoming rarer in the rising sea of noise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jn</title>
		<link>http://www.adotas.com/2009/05/new-york-times-checked-out-the-economist-lately/#comment-759890</link>
		<dc:creator>jn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 17:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adotas.com/2009/05/new-york-times-checked-out-the-economist-lately/#comment-759890</guid>
		<description>Interesting take on the subject, but here is the reality. The New York Times has taken far too many ideological stands and it has completely lost all journalistic credibility. I think your last point (no.4) sums up the demise of this once great publication and the many like it, &quot;Snob Appeal&quot;. When you forget about the majority of Americans while you attend your &quot;invitation only wine and cheese parties&quot; you lose. I don&#039;t read a news publication to feel better about my own twisted view of the world. I expect news publications to give me the full story and not a skewed version. Save the opinions and slant for the OPINION COLUMNS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting take on the subject, but here is the reality. The New York Times has taken far too many ideological stands and it has completely lost all journalistic credibility. I think your last point (no.4) sums up the demise of this once great publication and the many like it, &#8220;Snob Appeal&#8221;. When you forget about the majority of Americans while you attend your &#8220;invitation only wine and cheese parties&#8221; you lose. I don&#8217;t read a news publication to feel better about my own twisted view of the world. I expect news publications to give me the full story and not a skewed version. Save the opinions and slant for the OPINION COLUMNS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

