Advertisers overpaying for Google ads
ADOTAS — Google might be inflating advertisers’ conversion rates, leading advertisers to pay more than they should, a new analysis shows.
According to Ben Edelman, an assistant professor at the Harvard Business School, Google and its partners intercede in transactions advertisers would otherwise have received for free, so the true effectiveness of the ads Google delivers is overstated. Edelman shows how advertisers, when they measure conversion rates, mismeasure, and end up overpaying for traffic that is far less valuable than reporting systems suggest.
He breaks the four examples down into – Traffic source – How users are found – What would have happened had Google and its partners not interceded
WhenU – adware – User requests advertiser’s site. Adware covers advertiser’s site with pay-per-click listings. – Advertiser’s site displays as usual, with no covering popup. User stays at advertiser’s site, and advertiser pays no PPC fee.
Example – WhenU covers advertisers’ sites with advertisers’ own google ads
SmileyCentral – toolbar – Reconfigured browser tricks user into running a “search” for a site’s domain name. – User’s browser retains its ordinary configuration. User runs a direct navigation, and advertiser pays no PPC fee.
Example – IAC’s SmileyCentral grab advertisers’ organic traffic to show google ads
Typosquatting – User misspells advertiser’s domain name. User’s browser shows a list of alternatives, and user selects one — reaching advertiser’s site at no charge. Or, user sees an error page, notices the misspelling, and corrects the spelling to reach the advertiser’s site without a PPC fee.
Example – Cmcast.com, MediaLogik and others intercept users’ misspellings to show google ads.
Chrome – browser suggestions – User typing a web address is encouraged to run a search instead. – User finishes typing the site’s web address and reaches the advertiser’s site without a PPC fee.
Example – suggestions divert users from direct navigation to search.
Reader Comments.
HuH?
Leave a Comment
Article Sponsor
More News
-
Loading ...
Latest News
- Hulu’s Bringing Its “A” Game But… March 19th 2010 ADOTAS – Hulu’s sales team is actively subverting the ad [...] more »
- Yelp! A class-action suit? March 19th 2010 ADOTAS – One of three civil suits against Yelp filed [...] more »
- Viacom Accuses Google; Testing Digital Millennium Copyright Act March 19th 2010 Viacom has accused Google of turning a blind eye to [...] more »
- Google to Leave China April 10th? March 19th 2010 ADOTAS – According to the China Business News, Google Inc [...] more »
- [x+1] Creates The Smartest Tagging System Around March 18th 2010 ADOTAS – Today, if you happen to be at the [...] more »
- IAB’s Video Standards Tackled By ADTECH March 18th 2010 ADOTAS – ADTECH, a part of AOL Advertising and an [...] more »
- Google Search and Mobile and….TV? Oh My! March 18th 2010 ADOTAS – Google wants to dominate your screens…. Not just [...] more »
Features
- Growing Pains March 19th 2010
- For Better or For Worse? March 18th 2010
- Yahoo! Wants to Get More Personal March 17th 2010
- Creative Considerations for the iPad March 16th 2010
- Amazon Leaves Colorado Affiliates Out in the Cold March 12th 2010
Spotlight
AdBidCentral’s CEO, Vivek Veeraraghavan Talks Openly*What was the inspiration to start AdBidCentral? The conditions that inspired AdBidCentral came from a variety of factors in my personal [...] more...
Reader Favorites
Classifieds
- Sr Director, Marketing Services
- Senior Web Analyst
- Account Director
- Director of Analytics
- Manager, Business and Trade Media Relations
Recent Comments
- Jedd Gould: I think you miss the point. Publications have to charge because the content most are
- Gavin Dunaway: They're similar, but Ning is more a competitor to Facebook and MySpace while StumbleUpon considers
- Steve Feldman: Does StumbleUpon compete with and does essentially what Ning networks does?
- Bulent: I wonder how many of the clients would accept a media plan, that would -as
