<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: American Politicians and the Internet Cash Machine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adotas.com/2008/10/american-politicians-and-the-internet-cash-machine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adotas.com/2008/10/american-politicians-and-the-internet-cash-machine/</link>
	<description>Where Interactive Advertising Begins</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:07:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Olson</title>
		<link>http://www.adotas.com/2008/10/american-politicians-and-the-internet-cash-machine/#comment-653996</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Olson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adotas.com/2008/10/american-politicians-and-the-internet-cash-machine/#comment-653996</guid>
		<description>There is a huge distinction between the two campaigns. I made a point of talking to supporters of both candidates before posting this.

One is 27, and all her communication with the Obama campaign has been electronic. No traditional lit. (Other than a yeard sign)

The McCain supporter skews older, and while has donated completely online, reports receiving at least a dozen piece of traditional mail lit. Expensive to produce and send.

Last I checked, Obama had raised $604 million and you can even see his ads on video games of all places.

I&#039;ll disagree with the notion that Obama is Howard Dean 2.0. More like 3.0.

While polling is mentioned in the piece, that process really hasn&#039;t changed much.

So in an age of digital campaigning, can an  analog process truly measure what&#039;s going on?

I guess the big irony is, that in this digital age, where we can donate and campaign online, post blogs and opinions and interact with campaigns, we still can&#039;t vote online.

So we&#039;ll just wait and see how the votes add up on the 4th, or the 5th. Or maybe the 6th...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a huge distinction between the two campaigns. I made a point of talking to supporters of both candidates before posting this.</p>
<p>One is 27, and all her communication with the Obama campaign has been electronic. No traditional lit. (Other than a yeard sign)</p>
<p>The McCain supporter skews older, and while has donated completely online, reports receiving at least a dozen piece of traditional mail lit. Expensive to produce and send.</p>
<p>Last I checked, Obama had raised $604 million and you can even see his ads on video games of all places.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll disagree with the notion that Obama is Howard Dean 2.0. More like 3.0.</p>
<p>While polling is mentioned in the piece, that process really hasn&#8217;t changed much.</p>
<p>So in an age of digital campaigning, can an  analog process truly measure what&#8217;s going on?</p>
<p>I guess the big irony is, that in this digital age, where we can donate and campaign online, post blogs and opinions and interact with campaigns, we still can&#8217;t vote online.</p>
<p>So we&#8217;ll just wait and see how the votes add up on the 4th, or the 5th. Or maybe the 6th&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

