Fraud 2.0
As though straight out of some biblical parable, for whatever reason, a percentage of those engaging in an activity will do it the good way while a percentage will do it the bad way. In sports or academics, they call it cheating. In our industry, they call it fraud, and despite that it can lead to a loss of revenue, relationships, even jail, it still exists. And, no amount of lamenting or commenting that these wonderful misguided souls could do so much good if they just chose to apply their efforts to more accepted and law abiding forms of productivity, it won’t go way. Worst perhaps, it only continues to evolve and become more sophisticated, just as their counterparts in the less dark arts continue to improve their services. Take spyware for example. Those behind one of the newest strains have the skill to excel just about anywhere; they could have gone to Google, had their food, dry cleaning, and options. Instead, they seem content to earn millions by letting everyone know indiscriminately of their gender or age that their male genitalia need enhancement, and continue to innovate new ways of spelling that would confound even those in charge of naming Web 2.0 companies. While our space and particular brand of direct / affiliate marketing tends not to deal with promoting oral enhancements, we certainly can’t escape the impact, perhaps wrath of those engaging in fraud. I know I wouldn’t want to run a click based business, and much of the fraud in our space focuses on those perpetrating against click based businesses. Given that our industry revolves around actions, not clicks, it has always felt that we had less exposure to the dark side, and to some extent I think that holds true. Unfortunately, we see now that this doesn’t quite hold true, as a new type of fraud has begun to rear its head. It’s being called the Indy virus, a somewhat politically incorrect name based on the role that those in India inadvertently or perhaps knowingly play.
If you wanted to make some relatively easy money, unethically, it unfortunately doesn’t take much. Sign up for an ad network, especially one that has incentive promotion offers and do the following – enter an email address, a reasonable one. Do this across five such offers, perhaps two to five times daily. That will give you fifteen to twenty conversions, which at $1.25 will mean around twenty dollars daily. Then find one or two lead generation offers, perhaps an auto finance or insurance offer. Fill out one of those every other day, etc. Before you know it, you could end up earning $500 to $1000 per month in extra income. And, given that the average larger size affiliate network has hundreds of people earning several hundred dollars per month, you could slide by unnoticed for a while. The relative ease of pulling off low volume fraud is the very reason why networks tend not to allow affiliates from dollar weak countries where that $1000 could mean a real income. The person might have a legitimate website, but the risk is simply too great to take a chance. And, while $500 to $1000 can add up, the ambitious folks want more, and they know they can’t do it alone. This used to mean writing scripts that would fill out these email only forms or go through an address book and enter real but nonetheless bogus data into data only offers. With volume comes scrutiny, and the beauty of offers like the incentive promotion one comes in the form of relatively real time feedback on performance. An email address or zip doesn’t make the marketer any money. Only actions throughout the flow do, so if an advertiser sees a bunch of conversions coming from a certain source id that yielded no real revenue they can spot fraud fairly quickly. In other words, you can’t quite teach a machine to be human, but you can teach a human, and here is where we get into the heart of the Indy virus.
Reader Comments.
No comments yet
Leave a Comment
Pages: 1 2 next page »
Tags: ad-networks, affiliate-marketing, fraud, Indy-Virus, lead-gen and spywareArticle Sponsor
More Features
-
Loading ...
Latest News
- Hulu’s Bringing Its “A” Game But… March 19th 2010 ADOTAS – Hulu’s sales team is actively subverting the ad [...] more »
- Yelp! A class-action suit? March 19th 2010 ADOTAS – One of three civil suits against Yelp filed [...] more »
- Viacom Accuses Google; Testing Digital Millennium Copyright Act March 19th 2010 Viacom has accused Google of turning a blind eye to [...] more »
- Google to Leave China April 10th? March 19th 2010 ADOTAS – According to the China Business News, Google Inc [...] more »
- [x+1] Creates The Smartest Tagging System Around March 18th 2010 ADOTAS – Today, if you happen to be at the [...] more »
- IAB’s Video Standards Tackled By ADTECH March 18th 2010 ADOTAS – ADTECH, a part of AOL Advertising and an [...] more »
- Google Search and Mobile and….TV? Oh My! March 18th 2010 ADOTAS – Google wants to dominate your screens…. Not just [...] more »
Features
- Growing Pains March 19th 2010
- For Better or For Worse? March 18th 2010
- Yahoo! Wants to Get More Personal March 17th 2010
- Creative Considerations for the iPad March 16th 2010
- Amazon Leaves Colorado Affiliates Out in the Cold March 12th 2010
Spotlight
AdBidCentral’s CEO, Vivek Veeraraghavan Talks Openly*What was the inspiration to start AdBidCentral? The conditions that inspired AdBidCentral came from a variety of factors in my personal [...] more...
Reader Favorites
Classifieds
- Communications Fellow
- Sr Director, Marketing Services
- Senior Web Analyst
- Account Director
- Director of Analytics
Recent Comments
- Jedd Gould: I think you miss the point. Publications have to charge because the content most are
- Gavin Dunaway: They're similar, but Ning is more a competitor to Facebook and MySpace while StumbleUpon considers
- Steve Feldman: Does StumbleUpon compete with and does essentially what Ning networks does?
- Bulent: I wonder how many of the clients would accept a media plan, that would -as
