Microsoft Has Sour Grapes: Tattles on Google To Regulators
Two days after Google and DoubleClick had struck a deal, Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith called for regulators to give the deal a hard look. On the Sunday following the announcement of the Google/DoubleClick merger, Microsoft’s General Counsel made the following statement:“This proposed acquisition raises serious competition and privacy concerns in that it gives the Google-DoubleClick combination unprecedented control in the delivery of online advertising and access to a huge amount of consumer information by tracking what customers do online,” Smith said. “We think this merger deserves close scrutiny from regulatory authorities to ensure a competitive online-advertising market.”It should be noted that Yahoo! and AT&T also voiced “concerns” about the Google/DoubleClick deal, but Microsoft is the one who made the public statement.If the deal goes through, it has been argued Google would account for 80 percent of the ads served on the Internet. And what about the other 20%, well since Microsoft went public last month they have been busy makeing deals themselves. As most in the industry know Microsoft has agreed to buy aQuantive for $6 billion. Yes, that is nearly twice what Google is going to pay for DoubleClick if the deal withstands the FTC investigation. In April it made good business sense for Microsoft to presure federal regulators to investigate Google. But have they shot themselves in the foot, and will Google return the favor and insist that the aQuantive deal be scrutinised as well.This is the buisness climate of the internet titans. Google is the darling of the industry and Microsoft is, well, Microsoft. Privacy is really at the heart of the call for the investigation. It really has little to do with monopoly or lack of fair competition, issues which generally cause anti-trust investigations. Afterall, Microsoft Yahoo!, and AT&T were all eager to make the same deal with DoubleClick. Google just happened to succeed
Google has always welcomed the debate and has the advantage of the publics trust. Their whole business model has been based on an agreement of respect for the privacy of their users. It remains to be seen if this trust between Google and their users will remain intact after the FTC investigation runs its course.
Article Sponsor
More Features
Reader Comments.
I find it ironic (or perhaps fitting) that this article is written by “Editor,” yet it contains a slew of horrible grammatical errors, including misspelled words, periods where questions marks should be, and run-on paragraphs.
Who’s editing the editor?
Leave a Comment
Features
- Quality Video: DIY (Cheap) or Else December 1st 2008
- Will Widget Channel Be Tuned In? November 26th 2008
- Internet Vs. TV Smackdown: Friends or Foes? November 25th 2008
- Search Marketing Is Better Than a Bailout November 24th 2008
- With Ads, Pretty Is as Pretty Does November 21st 2008
Spotlight
Turn VP: Ad Network Shakeout “Inevitable”ADOTAS EXCLUSIVE – Turn bills itself as the world’s first Smart Market for online advertising. Turn’s VP of product and [...] more...
Latest News
- Media6Degrees Announces Commercial Launch December 1st 2008
- Whither $400 million in GM Ad Spending? December 1st 2008
- Twittering Disasters December 1st 2008
- Huffington Post Reels in $25M December 1st 2008
- Microsoft, Yahoo Search Deal a No-Go December 1st 2008
- I Got Me the Cyber Monday Blues December 1st 2008
- Strange Bedfellows: Obama and Spears Top Yahoo Searches December 1st 2008
- Thank God For Office Sex November 26th 2008
Reader Favorites
Classifieds
Most Commented
- Targeting Is the Ad Network "Killer App" (7)
- Vengence is Mine Saith Ballmer (6)
- Study: Blogs Beat Social Networks on Purchase Influence (5)
- Federal Bailout Proposed for Online Ad Industry (4)
- Ad Networks That Buck the Downward Trend (4)
- When Boomers, Gen Y Collide (4)
- Self-Serve Ad Exchange: This Century's Strowger Switch? (3)
- Bust-Outs and Layoffs: Apple, NBCU, Nokia, Spot Runner, WildTangent (3)

