<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Focus Flub: Why Google&#8217;s Old-Media Infiltration Seems Forced and Flawed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adotas.com/2007/03/google%e2%80%99s-focus-flub-why-google%e2%80%99s-old-media-infiltration-seems-forced-and-flawed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adotas.com/2007/03/google%e2%80%99s-focus-flub-why-google%e2%80%99s-old-media-infiltration-seems-forced-and-flawed/</link>
	<description>Where Interactive Advertising Begins</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:07:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Google really in ad-trouble?</title>
		<link>http://www.adotas.com/2007/03/google%e2%80%99s-focus-flub-why-google%e2%80%99s-old-media-infiltration-seems-forced-and-flawed/#comment-78748</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Google really in ad-trouble?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 16:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adotas.com/2007/03/google%e2%80%99s-focus-flub-why-google%e2%80%99s-old-media-infiltration-seems-forced-and-flawed/#comment-78748</guid>
		<description>[...] Chad M. Little gets our attention with an article, posted on adotas.com, in which he doubts the strategy Google implemented for its old-media infiltration. In fact, the article becomes the background for a larger and more in-depth analysis of the overall Google advertising strategy, both online and offline. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chad M. Little gets our attention with an article, posted on adotas.com, in which he doubts the strategy Google implemented for its old-media infiltration. In fact, the article becomes the background for a larger and more in-depth analysis of the overall Google advertising strategy, both online and offline. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Garcia</title>
		<link>http://www.adotas.com/2007/03/google%e2%80%99s-focus-flub-why-google%e2%80%99s-old-media-infiltration-seems-forced-and-flawed/#comment-77292</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Garcia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 02:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adotas.com/2007/03/google%e2%80%99s-focus-flub-why-google%e2%80%99s-old-media-infiltration-seems-forced-and-flawed/#comment-77292</guid>
		<description>Placing advertisers in the driver&#039;s seat is vital.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Placing advertisers in the driver&#8217;s seat is vital.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.adotas.com/2007/03/google%e2%80%99s-focus-flub-why-google%e2%80%99s-old-media-infiltration-seems-forced-and-flawed/#comment-77242</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 22:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adotas.com/2007/03/google%e2%80%99s-focus-flub-why-google%e2%80%99s-old-media-infiltration-seems-forced-and-flawed/#comment-77242</guid>
		<description>Anyone have a valid promo code for Quigo that gets $50 off for opening an account for $200?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone have a valid promo code for Quigo that gets $50 off for opening an account for $200?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Haar</title>
		<link>http://www.adotas.com/2007/03/google%e2%80%99s-focus-flub-why-google%e2%80%99s-old-media-infiltration-seems-forced-and-flawed/#comment-77222</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Haar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 21:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adotas.com/2007/03/google%e2%80%99s-focus-flub-why-google%e2%80%99s-old-media-infiltration-seems-forced-and-flawed/#comment-77222</guid>
		<description>Funny, there are different takes on the ability of Google to penetrate the off-line ad market. My &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.thinkaboutsearch.com/2007/02/09/google-spock-in-a-james-t-kirk-world.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; initial take&lt;/a&gt; on it was that they are out of touch with the off-line world (I still think so).  They do not understand the need, &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.thinkaboutsearch.com/2007/02/28/quigo.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;  like Quigo,&lt;/a&gt; for transparancy and the human touch.

Ultimately, they may be onto &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.thinkaboutsearch.com/2007/03/26/googleppa.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; something different&lt;/a&gt;...Owning the backend. I think they may end up more effective off-line behind the scenes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, there are different takes on the ability of Google to penetrate the off-line ad market. My <a href="http://blog.thinkaboutsearch.com/2007/02/09/google-spock-in-a-james-t-kirk-world.aspx" rel="nofollow"> initial take</a> on it was that they are out of touch with the off-line world (I still think so).  They do not understand the need, <a href="http://blog.thinkaboutsearch.com/2007/02/28/quigo.aspx" rel="nofollow">  like Quigo,</a> for transparancy and the human touch.</p>
<p>Ultimately, they may be onto <a href="http://blog.thinkaboutsearch.com/2007/03/26/googleppa.aspx" rel="nofollow"> something different</a>&#8230;Owning the backend. I think they may end up more effective off-line behind the scenes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

