Word-of-Mouth’s Ethical Effect: How Fair and Decent Marketing Can Increase your Initiative’s ROI
There’s been a lot of recent talk about ethics in word-of-mouth marketing. As stealth marketers and shills get more negative press, the calls for transparency and honesty are coming from an unlikely source: marketers themselves.
Few advocates give concrete reasons to practice ethical marketing beyond the fact that “it’s the right thing to do.” While treating your customers and prospective customers with respect certainly is the right thing to do, I’d like to add another compelling argument in favor of ethical marketing: it works.
You’ll get the higher quality, more sustainable results from word-of-mouth marketing initiatives when you follow ethical marketing guidelines. Using less-than-savory practices may yield a temporary “pop” in performance or awareness, but soon enough the sun shines through and you’ve burned those folks that are the lifeblood of your brand — people who recommend your products, services or content to others. This isn’t a question of good karma — it’s a consequence of the way the word-of-mouth channel works.
Ethical marketing
So what exactly is “ethical marketing” in word-of-mouth? What are the rules? How do they apply to customer evangelism, employee bloggers, tell-a-friend forms, and the 40 or more other types of marketing practices that fall under the umbrella of word-of-mouth marketing?
At its core, ethical marketing comes down to two things: be honest about the product or service and be honest about your stake in it.
The first half is simple enough: just apply the same FTC rules that you follow in your other marketing efforts. Don’t lie about your product. And avoid the temptation to use tactics that are technically legal, but misleading. Word-of-mouth lives or dies on whether consumers feel good or bad about you and your product, not whether they have legal recourse if they feel maligned.
More of the scandals in word-of-mouth marketing are related to honesty about your stake as a marketer in the product or service. Marketers who would never consider misrepresenting a product’s features or price in a print ad suddenly think it’s a good idea to pose as “independent” bloggers — and are invariably exposed and embarrassed.
Being honest about involvement with a brand or product actually increases your effectiveness as an advocate. Dr. Walter Carl, a leading researcher in word-of-mouth marketing, found that disclosure increased pass-along rates by as much as 70%* — a data point supported by our experience here at PopularMedia, Inc. Failing to disclose your involvement, however, can lead to massive consumer backlash — directly impacting your bottom line.
Why ethics matter more in word-of-mouth
In traditional marketing, you make your appeals directly to individual consumers through advertising, direct mail, or other channels. In this context, conversations between consumers have a comparatively small effect. As a result, if an individual consumer has a negative experience, it primarily impacts only that individual’s potential lifetime value — small stakes in a large market. Unfortunately, this can lead to a “take the money and run” attitude under which consumers are treated as disposable.
Word-of-mouth marketing is different. Marketing messages are spread through established peer-to-peer networks. Violate consumer trust at any point, and you could lose your chance to reach and convert an entire branch of any given network: not just one person, but dozens, hundreds, thousands, hundreds of thousands — even millions of people. This effect is immediate and enduring, meaning the decisions you make today will measurably impact your performance now and for a long time into the future.
How word-of-mouth spreads
The most important thing to remember is that word-of-mouth doesn’t spread randomly from person to person. If it did, you could bypass unhappy consumers and still reach their friends through other mutual acquaintances. After all, there is extensive overlap in social networks ¬— it seems like there should be as many different ways to get a message from person A to person B as the two people have friends in common.
By that metric, viral performance appears to be proportional to the number of “agents” you have, as long as each talks to as many people as possible with the hope that those people will pass the message along — and buy your product — at a given rate.
However, striking patterns emerge when you start to measure pass-along, conversion, and other key metrics — what we refer to internally and with our customers as viral performance indicators (VPIs) — for the “receivers” as well as the “senders” of your messages.
A graph of word-of-mouth conversations will resemble a complex web. Each person is represented as a point or “node”, connected to a number of other points by conversations or shared messages about your brand or product. But when you highlight only the successful conversations — the small percent that actually drive action and pass-along — your graph suddenly looks less like a web and more like a branching tree, with bursts of action connected by a small number of key individuals.
Reader Comments.
- Pingback from Consumer Court « Adventures in Marketing
Hello Jim,
I found your article to be well thought, persuasive and informative. Thank you. I have one question: You write that your company’s data supports Dr. Carl’s assertion that disclosure extends pass-along rates by up to 70 percent. Could you share information about how you, too, have arrived independently at similar conclusions?
Kindly,
Joe Chernov
Director of Communications
BzzAgent
Leave a Comment
Pages: 1 2 next page »
Tags: campaigns, ROI, viral and word-of-mouthArticle Sponsor
More Features
-
Loading ...
Latest News
- Funding in Brief: $10M for Spongecell, $8M for Prolexic February 9th 2012 ADOTAS – Rich media ad company Spongecell has raised $10 million [...] more »
- Google AdMob Axes Minimum Bids, Targeting Fees February 9th 2012 ADOTAS - As of Feb. 15, Google will change its [...] more »
- Infographic: HootSuite Analyses Social Media Impact of Super Bowl Ads February 7th 2012 ADOTAS - So, it’s the Tuesday after the Super Bowl, [...] more »
- Facebook to Serve Mobile Ads in Coming Weeks February 6th 2012 ADOTAS – According to a Financial Times report, Facebook will [...] more »
- Survey: 39 Percent of Mobile Users Responded to Super Bowl Ads Via Mobile February 6th 2012 ADOTAS - During the Super Bowl yesterday, mobile ad network [...] more »
- Sponsormob Leads the Way Into RTB for Mobile February 3rd 2012 ADOTAS – For more than half a decade, Berlin-based tech [...] more »
- Weird Study: Mobile Purchasing While in the Bathroom on the Rise February 3rd 2012 DM CONFIDENTIAL - According to 11mark, three-quarters of Americans with mobile [...] more »
Features
- Attribution Online: Introducers and Influencers and Closers… Oh My! February 9th 2012
- With gTLDs, Global Branding Starts with a Name February 9th 2012
- Rethinking the Online Advertising Ecosystem, Part One: Independent Publishers February 8th 2012
- Case Study: Social Ad Effectiveness February 8th 2012
- Video: “Build an SEO Foundation” Excerpt February 8th 2012
Spotlight
Sponsormob Leads the Way Into RTB for MobileADOTAS – For more than half a decade, Berlin-based tech firm Sponsormob has remained relevant in an industry characterized by [...] more...
Reader Favorites
Classifieds
- PS Technical Writer - SEO Data Analyst
- Interactive Project Manager
- Media Buyer
- PHP Software Engineer (Facebook Platform/Social AP
- SEO/Marketing Internship at Green Education Startu
Recent Comments
- With gTLDs, Global Branding Starts with a Name – ADOTAS | ShopComs.com: [...] With gTLDs, Global Branding Starts with a NameADOTASADOTAS – It's no longer important how
- Domain Outlook : Latest Domain News » Blog Archive » With gTLDs, Global Branding Starts with a Name - ADOTAS: [...] With gTLDs, Global Branding Starts with a NameADOTASADOTAS – It's no longer important how
- With gTLDs, Global Branding Starts with a Name: [...] and Microsoft have little to worry about over names like UnitedThis and UnitedThat. The
- ReTargeter » Attacking Bad Banners: Inaugural Edition: [...] between 0.01% to 0.1%. Even with retargeted ads, which tend to have clickthrough rates