Local Search, Part II: comScore Raises the Microscope on the Local Targeting Macrocosm
In an interview with James Lamberti, the SVP for comScore Marketing Solutions, details of the newly released study on the local/yellow page search market were discussed. The study is the second in a two-part series that analyzes the growing consumer trend of researching local information online. The first study analyzed all local search behavior, while this analysis focuses on Internet Yellow Pages searches that return business directory listings. These searches occur on the Local sections of major search sites (e.g. Yahoo! Local), or on business directory listing sites (e.g. Verizon SuperPages).
Lamberti also said that what was emerging was an understanding that local search was “occasion-based”. Besides double box and local search, a third category is city or regional search where people are looking for restaurant, clubs, shopping etc—a site like Citysearch is a good example.
This analysis revealed that 68 million U.S. Internet users performed an IYP search online in July. This represents a 46 percent increase versus a year ago. When analyzing the total share of IYP searches, which by their nature have local intent, comScore’s data reveals that Yahoo! Sites and Verizon SuperPages garnered the largest share, with 23.9 percent and 20.1 percent, respectively. Google Sites ranked third in IYP searches, capturing 12.5 percent, followed by Yellowpages.com with 12.0 percent.

Both double box (what and where) and local search box approaches are growing. However, IYP is growing at 23% and local search is growing at a 28% clip. But what is also interesting is the marketing share of the three major search engines:
1. Yahoo 13.3%
2. MSN 12.9%
3. Google 9.2%
This is certainly interesting in that, unlike general search market share, Yahoo and MSN are doing better then Google. As stated above, local search is growing faster than general search, so maybe the consensus in the business press that Yahoo and MSN can’t get any traction against Google is somewhat overstated.
It seems the advantage that Yahoo and MSN have is related to having register users, the information of which allows both to deliver better local/specific search results. If you look at Google’s newest version of their search bar, they are trying to do much of the same things without asking actual demographics. But there is no question that being a portal with registered users gives Yahoo and MSN the edge for local searching.
Article Sponsor
More Features
Reader Comments.
No comments yet
Leave a Comment
Spotlight
HipCricket: SMS Is Still the Wave of the FutureADOTAS EXCLUSIVE — HipCricket, a mobile marketing company, has been changing the way advertisers think about reaching their audiences since [...] more...
Features
- Media Plan ’08: Look Out of the Window October 10th 2008
- TV Advertising’s Future: A Long Paddle Upstream October 9th 2008
- Conversion Mastery: How Professionals Get Top Conversions October 9th 2008
- Out With the Old, in With the NEW October 8th 2008
- Decision 2008, The Internet Changed Everything October 7th 2008
Latest News
- Hiring Round Up: HealthCentral, Break Media, NetShelter October 10th 2008
- Microhoo: Back From the Dead? October 10th 2008
- Nielsen Online Expands to China October 10th 2008
- Mobile Gaming Firms Eye Nokia, Apple Boost in 2009 October 10th 2008
- Fitbit Bulks Up With $2M Infusion October 10th 2008
- Trulia Launches New Business Development Group October 10th 2008
- MindShare Buys Michaelides & Bednash October 9th 2008
- Entellium CEO, CFO Arrested by FBI October 9th 2008
Reader Favorites
Classifieds
Most Commented
- Can 314 Ad Networks Really Thrive? (8)
- Obama’s VP Pick Inauspicious for Net Neutrality (7)
- Facebook’s $100 Million Virtual Economy (2)
- Boomers Are Slutty Shoppers (2)
- Ralph Lauren Launches Mobile Shopping Site (2)
- NBC Loses Out on Huge Online Ad Opportunity for Olympics (2)
- Advertising GOLDMINE: Online News Sites? (2)
- Social Media and Agencies: Tools for Success (2)

