Mislead by Conversion Rates: A Closer Look at How Marketers Can Improve Campaign Performance
Recently, a leading multi-channel retailer engaged in a landing page test that sacrificed thousands of dollars and compromised plenty of ROI. The retailer’s fatal flaw? Relying solely on the almighty conversion rate.
The retailer tested two landing pages for its #1 keyword, “red jackets.” The first was a product list page featuring only red jackets; we’ll call this “The Red Page.” The second, “The Promo Page,” displayed an attractive young person modeling a jacket (not red), with a “Save $15 on orders over $100″ promotion.
The search engine marketing team alternated “The Red Page” and “The Promo Page” for all keywords in their Google “red jacket” campaign. Two weeks later, in an executive meeting, the search engine marketing manager boasted about the results.
“The Red Page proved to be the winner in our landing-page test with a 21% higher conversion rate than our Promo Page,” the manager said.
The announcement of the test results prompted smiles, “good jobs,” and other congratulatory verbal and non-verbal reactions by executives; none of whom fully realized they had just been duped by the misleading nature of the conversion rate.
Conversion rates are one of the most measured and optimized metrics in search marketing, and for good reason. A conversion rate is the percentage of visitors that result in a sale. So when a conversion rate improves, it is logical to assume that the ultimate metric, ROI, will also improve. Well, not so fast.
As a search engine marketing professional, I face situations like this all the time. Clients and other online marketers place too much emphasis on conversion rates when measuring performance. But conversion rates aren’t always king; king being defined as an “absolute ruler.” It is not absolutely guaranteed that one landing page, text ad, or other marketing component is performing better than another solely based on conversion rates.
While excited over the success of “The Red Page,” search engine marketer X neglected other factors that affect campaign success like traffic, revenue, average order value (AOV), earnings per click (EPC), and ROI.
Some visitors arrived on “The Red Page,” found a red jacket which retailed for $50, and went through the checkout process. Others landed on “The Promo Page,” found a red jacket for $50, and noticed the additional incentive, which offered $15 off of orders over $100.
The data below illustrates how other factors play a considerable role in search marketing performance. Had search engine marketer X considered more than conversion rates, the retailer would have maximized ROI and revenue.
Red Page: 2.3% Conversion Rate
Sales: 69
Revenue:$3,450
AOV: $50
EPC: $1.15
ROI: 2.3
Promo Page: 1.9% Conversion Rate
Sales: 57
Revenue: $4,845
AOV: $85
EPC: $1.62
ROI: 3.2
Lifetime value aside, the “Promo Page” is the true king in this test. If the retailer actually stopped testing the “Promo Page,” it would have forfeited $35 in AOV, $0.47 earnings per click, and a landing page that provided a 39% higher ROI. Not good at all.
Online marketers need to look at e-commerce conversion rates not as the sole performance indicator, but include it in a balanced scorecard that measures true online success.
Reader Comments.
Another way to improve your search marketing performance: Buy seemingly unrelated keywords.(http://johnrodkin.blogspot.com/2006/10/downside-of-quality-score.html)
Conversions can be quite misleading. Granular revenue data has to be taken into account especially when the promotion has a predictable effect on AOV like a spend X and receive Y.
Michael, thank you for raising a critically important subject for the industry as interactive marketing matures.
Clearly, we are interested in not just improving each hop in the conversion funnel. What we ultimately want to achieve is optimization across the entire customer decision making process.
At the moment, most companies struggle with this task given the functional silos that exist across lead generation, sales and management of the customer experience. This is exacerbated by further silos across channels.
The solution is integrated planning, testing and optimization across customer touchpoints. The benefits are obvious; profitable conversion of the right customers with deep insights gained about the decision making process itself.
Digital marketing is in fact leading us to a new functional paradigm where the customer facing process is the hub for a range of rapid test&learn cycles that inform key business processes.
All businesses need to transition from simple metrics that suit organization charts to more wholistic processes that center on the customer’s choices.
Coremetrics is a really good tool in figuring out conversions and drop off rate, intelligence is key to success for e-commerce sites.
Your article mentions “(2) lead quality percentage”. How do you measure this in practise ?
Thanks
Donald
The best case scenario is when you have the IT infrastructure capabilities to create a closed loop feedback system in which all leads are tracked throughout the entire sales process (click to final sale). This provides the greatest clarity, however is not always practical. Recently our agency introduced a new metric to our clients, CPQL or Cost-per-quality-lead. We actually develop a list of criteria with each client under which we agree a lead will be considered a “quality” lead. The criteria differ for each client, but some of the more common criteria include, (a) Valid Phone (b) Accepted Geography (c) Verified Need and (d) Allocated Budget.
Regardless of which system you utilize, there must be some connection to the online lead form and the lead once it enters the organization lead flow process. We have found one of the easiest ways is to create a unique ID for each lead generated at the time of form submission. This identifier can be passed as part of the online lead form to the sales team and easily passed back to your online tracking technology, which gives you that needed identifier to really begin appreciating the quality of your leads.
Hopes this helps, thanks for the great question..
Leave a Comment
Pages: 1 2 next page »
Tags: campaigns, lead_generation, ROI and SEMArticle Sponsor
More Features
-
Loading ...
Latest News
- Funding in Brief: $10M for Spongecell, $8M for Prolexic February 9th 2012 ADOTAS – Rich media ad company Spongecell has raised $10 million [...] more »
- Google AdMob Axes Minimum Bids, Targeting Fees February 9th 2012 ADOTAS - As of Feb. 15, Google will change its [...] more »
- Infographic: HootSuite Analyses Social Media Impact of Super Bowl Ads February 7th 2012 ADOTAS - So, it’s the Tuesday after the Super Bowl, [...] more »
- Facebook to Serve Mobile Ads in Coming Weeks February 6th 2012 ADOTAS – According to a Financial Times report, Facebook will [...] more »
- Survey: 39 Percent of Mobile Users Responded to Super Bowl Ads Via Mobile February 6th 2012 ADOTAS - During the Super Bowl yesterday, mobile ad network [...] more »
- Sponsormob Leads the Way Into RTB for Mobile February 3rd 2012 ADOTAS – For more than half a decade, Berlin-based tech [...] more »
- Weird Study: Mobile Purchasing While in the Bathroom on the Rise February 3rd 2012 DM CONFIDENTIAL - According to 11mark, three-quarters of Americans with mobile [...] more »
Features
- Attribution Online: Introducers and Influencers and Closers… Oh My! February 9th 2012
- With gTLDs, Global Branding Starts with a Name February 9th 2012
- Rethinking the Online Advertising Ecosystem, Part One: Independent Publishers February 8th 2012
- Case Study: Social Ad Effectiveness February 8th 2012
- Video: “Build an SEO Foundation” Excerpt February 8th 2012
Spotlight
Sponsormob Leads the Way Into RTB for MobileADOTAS – For more than half a decade, Berlin-based tech firm Sponsormob has remained relevant in an industry characterized by [...] more...
Reader Favorites
Classifieds
- PS Technical Writer - SEO Data Analyst
- Interactive Project Manager
- Media Buyer
- PHP Software Engineer (Facebook Platform/Social AP
- SEO/Marketing Internship at Green Education Startu
Recent Comments
- With gTLDs, Global Branding Starts with a Name – ADOTAS | ShopComs.com: [...] With gTLDs, Global Branding Starts with a NameADOTASADOTAS – It's no longer important how
- Domain Outlook : Latest Domain News » Blog Archive » With gTLDs, Global Branding Starts with a Name - ADOTAS: [...] With gTLDs, Global Branding Starts with a NameADOTASADOTAS – It's no longer important how
- With gTLDs, Global Branding Starts with a Name: [...] and Microsoft have little to worry about over names like UnitedThis and UnitedThat. The
- ReTargeter » Attacking Bad Banners: Inaugural Edition: [...] between 0.01% to 0.1%. Even with retargeted ads, which tend to have clickthrough rates
