<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judge Tosses Google Search Ranking Lawsuit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adotas.com/2006/07/judge-tosses-google-search-ranking-lawsuit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adotas.com/2006/07/judge-tosses-google-search-ranking-lawsuit/</link>
	<description>Where Interactive Advertising Begins</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:07:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cryptblade</title>
		<link>http://www.adotas.com/2006/07/judge-tosses-google-search-ranking-lawsuit/#comment-13172</link>
		<dc:creator>Cryptblade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 16:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adotas.com/2006/07/judge-tosses-google-search-ranking-lawsuit/#comment-13172</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m actually glad of this. As jealous as I am of Google, this suit would have set a bad precident.

I&#039;m glad the courts had enough understanding and knowledge to see that the suit was bunk and a sham. Although, as the article reports, the suit is still left open and it isn&#039;t over yet.

Still, I am glad of this decision. I think if it had gone through - then it would also have left it open for someone like Kinderstart to sue competitors for outranking them. It would  be a stretch but they could make the arguement that the other company used cheating methods outside the bounds of what Google uses to rank sites, etc.

I am also glad that as adults, we are holding up the concept of you can&#039;t cry if you dont get things your way.

I find it funny how this act by Kinderstart shows just how childish this company really is. I mean - you lose rankings in Google and lose business. Instead of revamping your business, you cry and sue someone. What a bad message and precident that would&#039;ve set.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m actually glad of this. As jealous as I am of Google, this suit would have set a bad precident.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad the courts had enough understanding and knowledge to see that the suit was bunk and a sham. Although, as the article reports, the suit is still left open and it isn&#8217;t over yet.</p>
<p>Still, I am glad of this decision. I think if it had gone through &#8211; then it would also have left it open for someone like Kinderstart to sue competitors for outranking them. It would  be a stretch but they could make the arguement that the other company used cheating methods outside the bounds of what Google uses to rank sites, etc.</p>
<p>I am also glad that as adults, we are holding up the concept of you can&#8217;t cry if you dont get things your way.</p>
<p>I find it funny how this act by Kinderstart shows just how childish this company really is. I mean &#8211; you lose rankings in Google and lose business. Instead of revamping your business, you cry and sue someone. What a bad message and precident that would&#8217;ve set.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

