SEM Marketers are Missing Out: Seven Ways to Mis-Measure Your SEM Program
Just how good is your Search Engine Marketing program? The only way to know, of course, is to measure it. But if, like many organizations, you rely on the standard reporting from an agency or PPC Bid-Management system then there’s a pretty good chance that you’re getting a partial or even seriously wrong read on your actual performance. In addition, you’re probably missing out on several measurement strategies than can significantly improve your PPC optimization and your overall SEM program balance.
Most companies these days have a web analytics solution in-house from a vendor like WebSideStory, Omniture or WebTrends. These are pretty good tools — and their sole function is to help understand web site performance and visitor behavior. And chances are that these same solutions are used to measure every aspect of web channel marketing except Search Engine Marketing.
For reasons both real and historical, Search Engine Marketing (SEM) activities have been walled-off from the rest of the web channel. Not only is the Search Campaign usually executed by outside buyers, these buyers and site optimizers are often managed by separate units and they use their own measurement tools and techniques. In most cases, the stated rationale for this is the need to have real-time analysis of conversion behavior channeling into a Bid Management system (more on this later).
This has led to significant duplication of effort — as organizations slap multiple tags on pages and create redundant organizations to understand and optimize the results. Perhaps worst of all, it has greatly increased the chances that SEM programs are optimizing locally instead of globally — achieving performance either at the expense of other goals or channels, or performing against goals that turn out to be meaningless to the business.
Here are some of the most common mis-measurements and missed opportunities that beset Search Engine Marketing programs.
Organic Cannibalization and Support: The degree to which a PPC program may be “borrowing” clicks from organic listings can have a dramatic impact on the perceived ROI of Paid Advertising. Knowing how many of your PPC visitors would have come to your site via an organic link is essential to understanding the actual value of a search term.
In our numerous studies of this issue, the most common result was significant organic cannibalization of “brand” terms and highly-positioned (top 3) organic terms. However, the degree of cannibalization varied widely (and could even provide support). In addition, this cannibalization was always accompanied by true incremental lift from PPC.
This last point is made much of by the various Search Engines in their marketing — and they address the issue of organic cannibalization with nearly identical data showing this undeniable lift. This “Yooglesoft” take on cannibalization misses the point, of course. Program managers need to know the real cost of incremental lift by search term or they can’t effectively manage their programs. Incremental lift is only desirable within some price range — and you can’t figure out the real price of the lift unless you understand the depth of cannibalization.
There is no one right answer about the extent or importance of organic cannibalization — there is only the right answer for your organization based on actual measurement. Most enterprise web analytics systems can do this type of analysis easily — and provide you with a significantly better understanding of your PPC programs real ROI than you’ll get from looking at your basic PPC statistics.
Reader Comments.
No comments yet
Leave a Comment
Pages: 1 2 next page »
Article Sponsor
More Features
Latest News
- Readers weigh in on ATT, ad networks and the iPhone July 2nd 2009 ADOTAS — In our weekly poll, readers overwhelmingly said that [...] more »
- Hiring, promotions, location, partnerships and product news July 2nd 2009 ADOTAS — Internet Oldtimers Foundation, Jumptap, eXelate, Kampyle, The Digital [...] more »
- OPA large ad units unfurl across the web July 1st 2009 ADOTAS — The Online Publishers Association said a group of [...] more »
- Email spam in June worst since 2007 July 1st 2009 ADOTAS — MessageLabs Intelligence released its numbers for June, and [...] more »
- Joost becomes YouTube roadkill, starts layoffs July 1st 2009 ADOTAS — Despite reworking its technology to work in a [...] more »
- Ad networks, not websites, choked on Michael Jackson news July 1st 2009 ADOTAS — The news of the pop star’s death saw [...] more »
- StrongMail doubling down on social media, buys PopularMedia July 1st 2009 ADOTAS — StrongMail has announced that it acquired PopularMedia, a [...] more »
Features
- Automakers Need to Become Better Conversationalists July 2nd 2009
- Affiliates can win in the media buy game July 2nd 2009
- Crowd-Sourced Ads: A Measured Response June 28th 2009
- Is the government coming for you? June 28th 2009
- Customer Loyalty: How to Earn It June 25th 2009
-
Loading ...
Spotlight
Trust Me – I’m a Professional … SEOADOTAS — At WebMetro we typically provide SEO Action Plans as part of campaigns. As the name implies, an SEO [...] more...
Reader Favorites
Layoff Tracker
- AOL - 700
- Apple - 50
- Clear Channel - 2,800 total (1,000 currently)
- Google - 340
- IBM - more than 7,800
- Joost - about 90
- MySpace - in June, about 720
- World Avenue - 30 percent of workforce
- Yahoo - 2,220 total, about 700 currently
- Zango - closes, about 90, in addition to earlier layoffs
Classifieds
Recent Comments
- Josette Davids: Great article and an amazing time was had by all at this event. I'm an
- Mike Poserina: There is also a tragic flaw rumored in Bing's ad placement engine. When resolved,
- Andy: Erin, Never mind the commenters who can only see the negative side of things. I thank you
- pkohler: We've also noticed that ads frequently adversely affects the performance of a Web page. As
