The Marketing ROI Equation: How it All Adds Up
If there were Oscars for the most overused business and marketing related terms, the nominating committee would have a tough time narrowing them down to the finalists. Businesspeople, media, consultants and others use these terms so ubiquitously that they have come to mean many things and nothing at all. The nominees would be comprised of at least the following terms; Outsourcing, Customer Relationship Management, One to One Marketing, Pay for Performance, and Marketing ROI.
And the winner is Marketing ROI.
This term in particular has pervaded virtually every corner of the marketing world from articles to meetings to seminars to corporate executives trying to figure out what marketing ROI really means, and lastly to service providers extolling their versions of marketing ROI. The reason this term has become such a buzzword is because companies large and small can no longer spend and invest marketing money without being able to show a measurable and acceptable rate of return on the capital deployed.
A big part of the reason that there is so much confusion about marketing ROI is because to really understand it and put it to use, several disciplines need to converge and work together that historically haven’t. Specifically, marketing people need to interact with finance and technology people. It’s the finance piece of this that is relatively new. In the “old days” marketing would be given a budget and they would find a way to spend it using their very best intentions. Marketing was a necessary cost of doing business; it wasn’t looked at like other capital expenditures and investments. After all, who could measure all that “creative” stuff? As globalization and other competitive pressures have transformed the competitive landscape, companies have had to become more Darwinian — that is, they’ve needed to find new ways to survive and thrive. One of those ways is to optimize the utilization of their scarce resources, one of which being capital. No longer was it acceptable for “marketing” to receive a budget without any accountability to its return.
Sooner or later, the marketing and finance groups got together and said, “Isn’t there a way we can actually measure what impact our marketing dollars are having on the growth of our business, so we can figure out how to best deploy these resources?” This began to occur in the early to mid 80’s when pc’s and database technology created tools enabling rapid and accurate measurement of these efforts. Over the years, lots of different disciplines including academia, internal large companies, small unsophisticated providers, and very sophisticated providers have developed a multitude of approaches towards definitions of marketing ROI.
At its core, marketing ROI is being able to measure the exact return for each marketing dollar deployed. As a definition, that sounds fairly simple. Where the complexity comes in and where most people oversimplify the exercise is in determining what to include in the calculation. For example, an everyday direct mail company will say that they can drive marketing ROI by making mail pieces for less and helping to increase response rates? A database company will say that their list scrubbing and modeling techniques will drive more efficient marketing and thereby improve marketing ROI. Loyalty companies will claim that their retention programs drive ROI. CRM companies claim their software and systems maximize customer lifetime value, thereby delivering marketing ROI. Interestingly, all of these claims are true and none of them are true.
Each unto themselves impacts part of the marketing ROI equation but none comprises the total equation. In a simplified view to make the point, in order to really quantify marketing ROI, one needs to follow a much more robust formula and set of equations that consist of the different elements depending on whether the goods being sold are products or services. That being said, the following are the guidelines to think about when trying to derive an actual marketing ROI calculation:
Reader Comments.
No comments yet
Leave a Comment
Pages: 1 2 next page »
No TagsArticle Sponsor
More Features
-
Loading ...
Latest News
- Hulu’s Bringing Its “A” Game But… March 19th 2010 ADOTAS – Hulu’s sales team is actively subverting the ad [...] more »
- Yelp! A class-action suit? March 19th 2010 ADOTAS – One of three civil suits against Yelp filed [...] more »
- Viacom Accuses Google; Testing Digital Millennium Copyright Act March 19th 2010 Viacom has accused Google of turning a blind eye to [...] more »
- Google to Leave China April 10th? March 19th 2010 ADOTAS – According to the China Business News, Google Inc [...] more »
- [x+1] Creates The Smartest Tagging System Around March 18th 2010 ADOTAS – Today, if you happen to be at the [...] more »
- IAB’s Video Standards Tackled By ADTECH March 18th 2010 ADOTAS – ADTECH, a part of AOL Advertising and an [...] more »
- Google Search and Mobile and….TV? Oh My! March 18th 2010 ADOTAS – Google wants to dominate your screens…. Not just [...] more »
Features
- Growing Pains March 19th 2010
- For Better or For Worse? March 18th 2010
- Yahoo! Wants to Get More Personal March 17th 2010
- Creative Considerations for the iPad March 16th 2010
- Amazon Leaves Colorado Affiliates Out in the Cold March 12th 2010
Spotlight
AdBidCentral’s CEO, Vivek Veeraraghavan Talks Openly*What was the inspiration to start AdBidCentral? The conditions that inspired AdBidCentral came from a variety of factors in my personal [...] more...
Reader Favorites
Classifieds
- Communications Fellow
- Sr Director, Marketing Services
- Senior Web Analyst
- Account Director
- Director of Analytics
Recent Comments
- Jedd Gould: I think you miss the point. Publications have to charge because the content most are
- Gavin Dunaway: They're similar, but Ning is more a competitor to Facebook and MySpace while StumbleUpon considers
- Steve Feldman: Does StumbleUpon compete with and does essentially what Ning networks does?
- Bulent: I wonder how many of the clients would accept a media plan, that would -as