Playboy’s “Girls of MySpace” Elicits Concern


MySpace may have been displeased to hear of Playboy’s upcoming plans for a “Girls of MySpace” photo spread on, but they are doing little to stop it. The pictorial will feature up to 30 young women and will draw on the now iconic brand image of the popular social networking site, but Playboy is not seeking the consent or partnership of MySpace in their preparations. The announcement of the plan has stirred a great deal of controversy, mostly centered on the observation that MySpace’s user base is largely comprised of teenagers and pre-teens.

MySpace already appears to be suffering a crisis of its image in the wake of several criminal investigations which implicate the site as a tool for potential sexual predators. Despite extensive disclaimers and security tips posted on, young users continue to post provocative pictures of themselves and personal information like their address, school name, schedule, and phone number. Needless to say, these children are putting themselves in a dangerous position. Last month, a 14-year-old girl from New Jersey, Judy Cajuste, was allegedly murdered by an older man who met her through the site. Just last week, in Middletown, Conn., authorities began looking into seven separate sexual assault cases involving minor females baited by older men through MySpace. Instances like these have turned the looming fears of parents everywhere and the subtext of the website’s disclaimers into horrifying reality.

They have also contributed to a major drop-off in the site’s advertising revenue. According to Nielsen/NetRatings data, MySpace fell from 12.4% to 4.8% of all online display ads between September and December of last year. While they are still a huge force in the online community, with membership numbers soaring above and beyond 55 million, the statistics suggest that sponsors are beginning to sense something is wrong. The site’s operators may not have committed these evils themselves, but no one wants to take your side when your name keeps popping up in the context of child molestation, rape, and even murder.

With this dark fog cast over their site, you would expect MySpace to do everything in its power to prove itself a safe and secure online community which operates in the best interests of its young audience. You would expect it to continue building its excellent outlet for online music, films, and games, and to crack down on all explicitly adult content and adult-directed advertising. Instead, MySpace has held its door wide open for Playboy—arguably the most widely recognized corporate symbol of sex.

While MySpace is not explicitly participating in the pictorial, it is by no means protesting it. Playboy continues to buy ad space on and maintains its own membership and profile on the site, which has enabled them to easily conduct their search for participants in the “Girls of MySpace.” You don’t even have to be 18 to add Playboy to your Friends list, a way for users to join in chats and blogging with representatives of the adult magazine.

While they are still well within the pages of, female users are being asked to send in nude pictures of themselves. Male users, don’t worry, Playboy wants you to participate by submitting write-ups of romantic encounters made possible by MySpace: “Guys! Have you made a sexy love connection or an outrageous hookup through the internet? Have your sexcapades published on!” I know of several outrageous MySpace hookups, and you don’t have to look much further than the morning paper or the evening news to see that they don’t always end with a loving kiss.

Playboy has created a successful formula out of similar brand-incorporated photo shoots. The Women of Wal-Mart, Enron, Starbucks, Home Depot and 7-11 spreads appealed to adult audiences because they convert the mundane corporate environment into a risqué world where the girl next door is eager to take her clothes off for you. When they produced the “Girls of McDonald’s” DVD in September of 2004, they embarked upon dangerous territory because of the fast-food brand’s huge appeal to a young market.

While this move raised some eyebrows, it didn’t incur even a slap on the wrist from McDonald’s themselves: “We neither condone, nor encourage participating in this type of activity. It is inconsistent with our brand,” McDonald’s spokeswoman Anna Rozenich said in statement at the time. Yet, like MySpace, they did nothing to stop it when they easily could have filed a lawsuit. The reason is obvious: free advertising. And sex sure sells.

What’s next for Playboy? “Women of Toys-R-Us?” “Ladies of Lego?” “Girls of Gerber?” Okay, that would be a little more extreme than MySpace, but it’s not too far off. If they are thinking that a majority of MySpace users are 18 or older, they are fooling themselves. The content and format of the site is specifically targeted at kids, because most kids are more adept with online networking than their parents. You may enjoy chatting, blogging, making internet friends, posting pictures, finding new music, and playing games online, but young people everywhere have gradually begun to live and die by these things. They have come off the playgrounds and out of the streets to inhabit the online community, and some things they are doing and finding there would shock and disturb most parents.

If you are going to build an online community that pulls in a huge number of impressionable young users, don’t allow Playboy to come into the room and taint everything. The sexual invitation implicit in “Girls of MySpace” makes MySpace’s case for trying to solve the problem of internet sexual predation look absurd.


  1. Uh, what controversy is there about this besides your blog? Have you had an advertiser contact you and tell you they’re upset about this Playboy issue?

    Only 25% of MySpace’s users are under 18–you can get that from same companies you MISQUOTE about ad revenue up above.

    Your facts about ads shown on Myspace are wrong. Not to mention that ads displayed have nothing to do with ads payed for, or a company’s revenues.

    But this is a blog, so who cares about facts?

  2. Actually, most under-18 year olds on MYSPACE register at over-18 because they are restricted otherwise and can not contact their over 18 friends. Most experts believe that the OVERWHEMLING majority of MYSPACE users are under 18, young women.

  3. Wow Dave, I hope you have not been caught out there with a 15 year old posing as an 18 year old. How naive that you would think that way.

    Hey all you dads out there, lock up your daughters!

  4. The facts I mentioned are from Nielsen/NetRatings third-party statistics, not what users enter on their MySpace profiles.

    Your suggestion that MySpace ads have dropped off due to a controversy about predators is not based in fact.

    This is an opinion piece, and worse, its not an opinion about advertising, it’s about your moral dislike for Playboy.

  5. Ok, let’s turn it back to advertising then.

    Think about it. Brand name advertisers showing up on underage porn? You think an agency wouldn’t flip out to find their client’s ad here?

    MySpace could clamp down on this, but why would they? It attracts users.

    This Playboy coverage is music to their ears… until advertisers start going on the site only to find where their ads are showing.

  6. Being a freelance journalist & a college student, & having been with Myspace over the year & part of plenty of groups, which I promote there, I transparently give you my url & comment on this, respectively. It is absurd to draw the conclusion for the simple fact Playboy took some of their fans off Myspace & recognized them on their own site directly, that they encourage child molestation in any way. You did not specify if they applied, or how they selected them, I am part of that group & promote it, but did not know about that, as most don’t, even those in the group itself. No network is perfect, for this network to be blocked in a school library for example, I think is unacceptable & violates our freedom of information, one thing is to download stuff, but if your in a network there is always good & bad, morals should not be imposed this way. You know anyone can make a group or profile for free, mostly fans make groups & use the names of famous things to get attention. There are age limits & photo content limits on Myspace that are mostly respected, those that violate it will be kicked off when discovered. Tom is a respectable man, he is the one that started this, obviously he could have never imagined it was get as big as it is, but you must accept it & move on. I am not a pervert because I do not adhere to the taboo of not having a friend under age, if you accuse me of that, its slander. I am not concerned with age but for your information I have plenty of friends on Myspace over 18. You can look in category for people with things in common there, most look for friends simply, I am one of the few that has a wide range of groups I promote openly, in my friend bulletins, etc; I think on another point you made, just because they do not intiate a law suite against people that falsely associate themselves with Myspace & tarnish the reputation, which none of your examples show, does not mean they are for it for not taking action. It is a complicated business & I insist the norms are mostly respected.

  7. What is the problem with myspace, at 18 your legally alowed to look at naked people, but your saying that myspace is naked, no its not, it is close to it in some cases, but it is not naked


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here